Wat.

"ghosty - electric space wizard" (gh0sty501) 12/16/2013 at 20:29 • Filed to: None

3

5

Blondude > ghosty - electric space wizard 12/16/2013 at 20:31

0

The X5M has 555 HP and500 foot pounds of torque. Those are nice big numbers. The Raptor has 411 HP and434 foot pounds of torque. Big, but smaller numbers. The X5M is constantly made fun ofby auto enthusiasts. If you remember Doug Demuro's post a while back it was even the picture for his article on "shittiest pieces of existence ever". On paper the X5M seems like the better car, and don't ask me which one is becaue I've driven neither, I'm a student hooning a 328i and I can't even afford to let the supple leather of either cars touch my "peasent" ass. The Raptor definitely destroys the X5M in one major category, respect. The Raptor has even been complimented by 335i owners, and those are the douchy E90 guys (no offense, don't kick me off E90post plz) I've never seen 335 owners talk nicely about a performance vehicle that weighs anything more than their E92s. The raptor somehow managed to please them on a recent post on e90post and I was completely surprised. In another post about SUVs, every 335i owner was ridiculing the OP for considering an SUV with performance capabilities ( X5M, Cayenne GTS, ML63) and suggested him to get a wagon, while some OTHER 335 guys trash talked wagons immediately afterwards. The raptor someone has these negative Nelly's on the dark side, which baffles me. Both get abysmal fuel economy, one is focused solely off-road and the other on road, so why does one of them get so much hate?

KIIIIINJAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles > ghosty - electric space wizard 12/16/2013 at 20:31

0

ghosty - electric space wizard > Blondude 12/16/2013 at 20:31

1

Right!? I side-scrolled for years !

TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts. > ghosty - electric space wizard 12/16/2013 at 20:32

0

Right? What the fuck Kinja?

DasWauto > ghosty - electric space wizard 12/16/2013 at 20:37

1

Fixed it. Some funny html going on there, I guess.